If by “Gay Marriage” you mean that the government, or any government, can issue a license to two consenting adults to share their lives in the same way that men and women traditionally have, then I am all for it. Since government already has the authority to permit marriage and collect a fee, government can define marriage. It is only fair that any committed couple can inherit property, and enjoy such legal benefits as the government permits and provides.
But…
…if by “Gay Marriage” you mean that the government, or any government, can require any church or body of believers, or any clergy thereof, to perform, sanction, and accept as scripturally and spiritually correct any such “marriage”, then I am firmly and forever against it.
11parsecs reblogged this from 11parsecs and added:
geekyhippiepunk likes this
